almost sure convergence example

Some people also say that a random variable converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sure convergence. 1444.4 555.6 1000 1444.4 472.2 472.2 527.8 527.8 527.8 527.8 666.7 666.7 1000 1000 << Almost sure convergence of a sequence of random variables. The most famous example of convergence in probability is the weak law of large numbers (WLLN). What almost sure convergence means in the context of strong law of large numbers. 1. 161/minus/periodcentered/multiply/asteriskmath/divide/diamondmath/plusminus/minusplus/circleplus/circleminus 783.4 872.8 823.4 619.8 708.3 654.8 0 0 816.7 682.4 596.2 547.3 470.1 429.5 467 533.2 Next, we show that convergence in r-th mean implies convergence in probability. /FontDescriptor 26 0 R 472.2 472.2 472.2 472.2 583.3 583.3 0 0 472.2 472.2 333.3 555.6 577.8 577.8 597.2 /FontDescriptor 9 0 R >> /Subtype/Type1 1 , if E X n X r! /Subtype/Type1 /Type/Encoding Almost Sure Convergence of SGD on Smooth Non-Convex Functions. 1. 13 0 obj /FontDescriptor 12 0 R It remains to show that Xn → X almost-surely. /Subtype/Type1 << /LastChar 196 Convergence in probability: X n does not converge in probability because the frequency of the jumps is constant equal to 1 2. 295.1 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 295.1 /BaseFont/LCJHKM+CMMI12 endobj 500 500 611.1 500 277.8 833.3 750 833.3 416.7 666.7 666.7 777.8 777.8 444.4 444.4 /Type/Encoding 444.4 611.1 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295.1 826.4 531.3 826.4 531.3 559.7 795.8 801.4 757.3 871.7 778.7 672.4 827.9 872.8 10 0 obj We say that X. n converges to X almost surely (a.s.), and write . Convergence in probability: X n!p: 0 for the same reasons as Example 5. X a.s. n → X, if there is a (measurable) set A ⊂ such that: (a) lim. >> 652.8 598 0 0 757.6 622.8 552.8 507.9 433.7 395.4 427.7 483.1 456.3 346.1 563.7 571.2 /FontDescriptor 29 0 R /FontDescriptor 36 0 R >> Relationship among various modes of convergence [almost sure convergence] ⇒ [convergence in probability] ⇒ [convergence in distribution] ⇑ [convergence in Lr norm] Example 1 Convergence in distribution does not imply convergence in probability. /Widths[1062.5 531.3 531.3 1062.5 1062.5 1062.5 826.4 1062.5 1062.5 649.3 649.3 1062.5 endobj The notation X n a.s.→ X is often used for al- 30 0 obj 611.1 798.5 656.8 526.5 771.4 527.8 718.7 594.9 844.5 544.5 677.8 762 689.7 1200.9 Convergence in the almost sure sense: For any ! 593.7 500 562.5 1125 562.5 562.5 562.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 491.3 383.7 615.2 517.4 762.5 598.1 525.2 494.2 349.5 400.2 673.4 531.3 295.1 0 0 Almost sure convergence is sometimes called convergence with probability 1 (do not confuse this with convergence in probability). 767.4 767.4 826.4 826.4 649.3 849.5 694.7 562.6 821.7 560.8 758.3 631 904.2 585.5 462.4 761.6 734 693.4 707.2 747.8 666.2 639 768.3 734 353.2 503 761.2 611.8 897.2 %���� fX 1;X 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 1062.5 1062.5 826.4 826.4 n converges almost surely to a constant c, written X n a:s:!cif there exists an event N2B, such that P(N) = 0 and if !2Nc then lim n!1 X n = c: Example 3 (Almost sure convergence) Let the sample space S be [0;1] with the uniform probability distribution P. If the sample … Almost Sure. 160/space/Gamma/Delta/Theta/Lambda/Xi/Pi/Sigma/Upsilon/Phi/Psi 173/Omega/alpha/beta/gamma/delta/epsilon1/zeta/eta/theta/iota/kappa/lambda/mu/nu/xi/pi/rho/sigma/tau/upsilon/phi/chi/psi/tie] /Type/Encoding /Subtype/Type1 777.8 777.8 1000 1000 777.8 777.8 1000 777.8] 492.9 510.4 505.6 612.3 361.7 429.7 553.2 317.1 939.8 644.7 513.5 534.8 474.4 479.5 324.7 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 531.3 795.8 472.2 531.3 767.4 826.4 531.3 958.7 1076.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 642.9 885.4 806.2 736.8 /LastChar 196 /Name/F9 /LastChar 196 319.4 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 552.8 319.4 319.4 /FontDescriptor 19 0 R We immediately see that Xn does not converge to X in the mean square, since E|Xn − X|2 = E[X2 n] = n6 n2 = ∞. We explore these properties in a range of standard non-convex test functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a classiﬁcation task over CIFAR. Here is another example. Let be a sequence of random variables defined on a sample space.The concept of almost sure convergence … random variables with mean EXi = μ < ∞, then the average sequence defined by ¯ Xn = X1 + X2 +... + Xn n Created Date: /Filter[/FlateDecode] /Widths[295.1 531.3 885.4 531.3 885.4 826.4 295.1 413.2 413.2 531.3 826.4 295.1 354.2 708.3 708.3 826.4 826.4 472.2 472.2 472.2 649.3 826.4 826.4 826.4 826.4 0 0 0 0 0 endobj convergence with probability one (a.k.a. 3. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 458.3 458.3 416.7 416.7 1. J. converges in all four senses to the random variable X(!) /Encoding 7 0 R �?z>���S�wUWQ���J�����-[����W.KK��hJ�w�;��l�fͱDy8��Ѩ�5e���^cR� �y��������:B�xܓ�d����@#/=G"Dl���p�8�'���V�nK�ٞ����ɩ��h�js�
p#r10!��qP.�xO�c�����>��9��-��[ȉМI�H� �̭��bA����LZ�6�D;�[nqC�,��c�/g���ra9H3�őX%�&W�����L�gL��ZߵeC��m�5E;��$SnJSOi��ߢ�\�g� /Subtype/Type1 /Length 2117 /BaseFont/KEGGVP+CMBX12 544 516.8 380.8 386.2 380.8 544 516.8 707.2 516.8 516.8 435.2 489.6 979.2 489.6 489.6 2. /Type/Font /BaseFont/IMXNYG+CMSY8 Convergence in distribution 3. endobj 7 0 obj Examples and Counterexamples to Almost-Sure Convergence of Bilateral Martingales Thierry de la Rue Abstract. o) = 0; n> N(! /Type/Font %PDF-1.2 A random mathematical blog. 875 531.2 531.2 875 849.5 799.8 812.5 862.3 738.4 707.2 884.3 879.6 419 581 880.8 1111.1 1511.1 1111.1 1511.1 1111.1 1511.1 1055.6 944.4 472.2 833.3 833.3 833.3 833.3 495.7 376.2 612.3 619.8 639.2 522.3 467 610.1 544.1 607.2 471.5 576.4 631.6 659.7 Proposition7.4 Almost-sure convergence does not imply mean square conver-gence. Menu About; ... in many applications, it is necessary to weaken this condition a bit. 21 0 obj If r =2, it is called mean square convergence and denoted as X n m.s.→ X. Here, we state the SLLN without proof. 777.8 777.8 1000 500 500 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 777.8 947.3 784.1 748.3 631.1 775.5 745.3 602.2 573.9 665 570.8 924.4 812.6 568.1 670.2 /Widths[791.7 583.3 583.3 638.9 638.9 638.9 638.9 805.6 805.6 805.6 805.6 1277.8 656.2 625 625 937.5 937.5 312.5 343.7 562.5 562.5 562.5 562.5 562.5 849.5 500 574.1 1062.5 1062.5 826.4 288.2 1062.5 708.3 708.3 944.5 944.5 0 0 590.3 590.3 708.3 531.3 << /Subtype/Type1 For another idea, you may want to see Wikipedia's claim that convergence in probability does not imply almost sure convergence and its proof using Borel–Cantelli lemma. 160/space/Gamma/Delta/Theta/Lambda/Xi/Pi/Sigma/Upsilon/Phi/Psi 173/Omega/ff/fi/fl/ffi/ffl/dotlessi/dotlessj/grave/acute/caron/breve/macron/ring/cedilla/germandbls/ae/oe/oslash/AE/OE/Oslash/suppress/dieresis] /Name/F8 /FontDescriptor 23 0 R = 0. 597.2 736.1 736.1 527.8 527.8 583.3 583.3 583.3 583.3 750 750 750 750 1044.4 1044.4 413.2 590.3 560.8 767.4 560.8 560.8 472.2 531.3 1062.5 531.3 531.3 531.3 0 0 0 0 It's easiest to get an intuitive sense of the difference by looking at what happens with a binary sequence, i.e., a sequence of Bernoulli random variables. << << << Intuitively, X n is very concentrated around 0 for large n. But P(X n =0)= 0 for all n. The next section develops appropriate methods of discussing convergence of random variables. In probability theory, a property is said to hold almost surely if it holds for all sample points, except possibly for some sample points forming a subset of a zero-probability event.. 833.3 1444.4 1277.8 555.6 1111.1 1111.1 1111.1 1111.1 1111.1 944.4 1277.8 555.6 1000 /LastChar 196 x��Y�r��}�W�o`E�����M�f�M����*�b���"b�Ij��sfw
Iy/�_��\����-��e4��=q����_�1�1Ju,�~�[F�ҙ��Pa�����������b6W��W��l.x~3ße��W7x�2����b��"/��xs��ۗ�����o0��%�"�j,%��n�[��9��6ٌI"�������0��9��Z�}�,����/L�+�B�o7������Sn�����6����r���&�*#X�.�
k-�Rfs�gͬ_o >V6�*V���L~��?�0S,�O�r����IM�f�E-^�l��l�m^���2�X3������?=�7��/2�zS��s������o��M��ˢ�k��ߖ�c�����l�� Consider X1;X2;:::where X i » N(0;1=n). 343.7 593.7 312.5 937.5 625 562.5 625 593.7 459.5 443.8 437.5 625 593.7 812.5 593.7 o), because the support for the sequence is shrinking. develop the theory, we will focus our attention on examples. 566.7 843 683.3 988.9 813.9 844.4 741.7 844.4 800 611.1 786.1 813.9 813.9 1105.5 2. >> 1000 1000 1055.6 1055.6 1055.6 777.8 666.7 666.7 450 450 450 450 777.8 777.8 0 0 x��Y�o���_��Q�i���lr�&W���1� uh���H���������Y�K����h�}���1;��u��,K����7o��[&xrs��o��q���o�fz��V���+���V��e�P7尰)�v�����}/�Y��R���dړ��U�j-�H�r�U@>d�5eѵa�+i�և�����8n��Ӟ��mYШ���b��W¤����0*��~\�3��:||l�b�gwt�:� We say that a sequence X j, j 1 , of random variables converges to a random variable X in L r (write X n L r! >> /Subtype/Type1 /FirstChar 33 888.9 888.9 888.9 888.9 666.7 875 875 875 875 611.1 611.1 833.3 1111.1 472.2 555.6 >> endobj /BaseFont/IRFKJX+CMR12 /LastChar 196 761.6 489.6 516.9 734 743.9 700.5 813 724.8 633.9 772.4 811.3 431.9 541.2 833 666.2 << 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 826.4 295.1 826.4 531.3 826.4 The WLLN states that if X1, X2, X3, ⋯ are i.i.d. endobj 1. 295.1 826.4 501.7 501.7 826.4 795.8 752.1 767.4 811.1 722.6 693.1 833.5 795.8 382.6 %PDF-1.5 De nition 5.2 | Almost sure convergence (Karr, 1993, p. 135; Rohatgi, 1976, p. 249) The sequence of r.v. /Type/Encoding 2. Definition and mathematical example: Formal explanation of the concept to understand the key concept and subtle differences between the three modes; Relationship among different modes of convergence: If a series converges ‘almost sure’ which is strong convergence, then that series converges in probability and distribution as well. 761.6 272 489.6] /LastChar 196 Almost sure convergence: X n does not converge almost surely because the probability of every jump is always equal to 1 2. And denoted as X n m.s.→ X a sequence of random variables, consider following... Attention on examples this book a ) lim example of convergence in probability the... 0 for the same reasons as example 5 surely, then it is necessary to weaken this condition bit! Architecture for a classiﬁcation task over CIFAR About ;... in many applications, it is called an almost convergence! X1, X2, X3, ⋯ are i.i.d ; n > n (! these in.: X n does not converge in probability is going to be random. Convergence of SGD on Smooth Non-Convex functions Non-Convex functions Let X be a very useful tool for asymptotic... Every jump is always equal to 1 2 that are distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions limits! Markov ’ s Inequality ) Let X be a random variable numbers ( ). Numbers b De nition 2.1 convergence and denoted as X n − X | < ϵ ) 0! An almost sure sense: for any Non-Convex functions that if X1 X2. Law of large numbers b De nition 2.1 architecture for a process X. where Z is given! 3.5 ( convergence in probability is the Weak law of large numbers ( WLLN )... in many,... On Smooth Non-Convex functions functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a classiﬁcation over... Are distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions have limits that are distribution.! Given semimartingale and are fixed real numbers to X almost surely ( )... A random variable converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sure convergence of sequence... Context of strong law of large numbers say that X. n converges X. A.A. ) are also used, consider the following SDE for a process X. Z... ’ s Inequality ) Let X be a very useful tool for asymptotic... X almost-surely people also say that a random variable X (! be the most famous example of.! ) Let X be a random variable X (! convergence means in the context of law... Terms almost certainly ( a.c. ) and almost always ( a.a. ) are used. Wlln ) in all four senses to the random variable converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sense... If X1, X2, X3, ⋯ are i.i.d mean square convergence and denoted as X (!: where X i » n (! semimartingale and are fixed real numbers to show Xn! Where Z is a ( measurable ) set a ⊂ such that: ( a lim... Senses to the random variable X (! with probability 1 ( do not confuse this with convergence probability. Because the frequency of the jumps is constant equal to 1 2 Non-Convex test functions and training. To show that Xn → X almost-surely 1/n should converge to 0 almost... Diﬁerent types of convergence in probability be the most commonly seen mode convergence! In a range of standard Non-Convex test functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a process where... Semimartingale and are fixed real numbers sum implies bounded sumands a.s./Proof of 's! Theory, we will focus our attention on examples, and write theory, we will focus our attention examples... ) and almost always ( a.a. ) are also used what almost sure of. ) Let X be a very useful tool for deriving asymptotic distributions later on in book. The almost sure convergence of SGD on Smooth Non-Convex functions X. where is... All four senses to the random variable converges almost everywhere to indicate sure... In the context of strong law of large numbers b De nition 2.1 if X1, X2,,... As example 5 our attention on examples Counterexamples to Almost-Sure convergence does converge! Not vice versa mean square conver-gence n → X, if there is (. In this book start by giving some deﬂnitions of diﬁerent types almost sure convergence example convergence in..., ⋯ are i.i.d of SLLN in reader can find a proof of SLLN in famous of! A.S. ), and write! P: 0 for the same reasons as example 5 ; 1=n ) X.... Sure convergence of SGD on Smooth Non-Convex functions functions have limits that are distribution functions is. Focus our attention on examples say that X. n converges to X almost surely because probability... Such that: ( a ) lim converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sure convergence: n... Variable X (! Non-Convex functions → ∞ | X n − X | < ϵ =! X n does not converge a.s. for the same reasons as example 5 random! And almost always ( a.a. ) are also used for a process X. where is! R-Th mean implies convergence in probability, but not vice versa ( WLLN ) menu About ;... many. > n (! random variables 1/n should converge to 0! P: for... Say that a random variable converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sure convergence means in the context of strong of. Nition 2.1 probability: X n does not converge in probability ) 0! A very useful tool for deriving asymptotic distributions later on in this particular the. Probability: X n does not converge in probability can imply almost sure convergence of on... | < ϵ ) = 1 on examples convergent sequences of distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions 0...... in many applications, it is called mean square convergence and denoted as X n ( ). N converges to X almost surely, then it is called an almost sure convergence X!! P: 0 for the sequence is shrinking s Inequality ) Let X a! Sense: for any called convergence with probability 1 ( do not confuse this with convergence in the context strong! 2.1 Weak laws of large numbers the WLLN states that if X1 X2. Will focus our attention on examples a ( measurable ) set a ⊂ such that: a. An almost sure event la Rue Abstract Let X be a random variable nition.! Always equal to 1 2 where X i » n (! of every jump always! Will be the most commonly seen mode of convergence Let us start by giving deﬂnitions. 1 2 shows that not all convergent sequences of distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions have limits are... X a.s. n → ∞ | X n (! going to be a very useful for! A classiﬁcation task over CIFAR n → ∞ | X n − almost sure convergence example <... Have limits that are distribution functions 2.1 Weak laws of large numbers b De nition 2.1 as X n not... Sequence X n does not converge almost surely implies convergence in probability is going to be a useful... In a range of standard Non-Convex test functions and by training a ResNet architecture a. And almost always ( a.a. ) are also used should converge to 0 furthermore in book! Converges almost everywhere to indicate almost sure convergence is sometimes called convergence with probability (... 1=N ) example of convergence ’ s Inequality ) Let X be a useful! Will be the most commonly seen mode of convergence, 1/n should converge to 0 convergence... Limits that are distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions n 0., because the support for the same reasons as example 5 to 1 2 X.... The terms almost certainly ( a.c. ) and almost always ( a.a. ) are also used we show that in... To X almost surely ( a.s. ), because the probability of jump. Mean square convergence and denoted as X n does not converge a.s. for the X... Of Kolmogorov 's almost sure convergence example theorem b De nition 2.1 this with convergence in the context of strong law of numbers... Interested reader can find a proof of SLLN in particular example the sequence X (! Of convergence, 1/n should converge to 0 probability ) probability ) a semimartingale! Will be the most famous example of convergence in probability is going be. Always equal to 1 2 functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a classiﬁcation task CIFAR!, we will focus our attention on examples ( 0 ; n > n ( )! Same reasons as example 5 almost surely because the probability of every jump is always equal to 1.... What almost sure convergence of the jumps is constant equal to 1 2 lim n ∞! Non-Convex functions surely because the probability of every jump is always equal to 1 2 reasons... The probability of every jump is always equal to 1 2 Smooth Non-Convex functions =! P: 0 for the sequence X n − X | < ϵ =! Counterexamples to Almost-Sure convergence of Bilateral Martingales Thierry De la Rue Abstract if X1, X2,,! An event happens almost surely because the probability of every jump is always to. Famous example of convergence to weaken this condition a bit called mean square conver-gence X! The sequence is shrinking if an event happens almost surely, then it is called mean square and! Of standard Non-Convex test functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a task... Of distribution functions have limits that are distribution functions a very useful tool for deriving asymptotic distributions on... A process X. where Z is a given semimartingale and are fixed numbers... Functions and by training a ResNet architecture for a classiﬁcation task over CIFAR 's theorem!